Will WWE Sink or Swim Following Cody Rhodes, Randy Orton Injuries?

The outlook for WWE's men's main event scene just keeps getting worse.
Once Cody Rhodes went out of the picture with a torn pec, it was obvious WWE would shift things over to Randy Orton this summer when it came time to throw legitimate contenders at Roman Reigns for his title(s).
But now Orton isn't available either, with Fightful Select (h/t WrestlingInc's Dominic DeAngelo) reporting that Orton will miss more time than expected, producing a "fear" within the company that an operation could keep him out for the rest of the year.
That leaves little for Reigns to do given WWE's situation in the men's main event scene. The challenge from Riddle feels like a time-filler until SummerSlam, as the company's top champion isn't booked to appear at pretty much anything until then, including Money in the Bank.
Once that minor hurdle gets cleared, things likely transition to Drew McIntyre. Given that Seth Rollins is the best thing running in the company right now, and perhaps in the midst of his best run ever, there's a chance he pulls in the Money in the Bank briefcase and dips a little into the "Architect" persona to steal a title from Reigns over the summer.
But those are layup feuds with Rhodes and Orton gone, and there's a big question hanging over both of them—will WWE let Reigns lose a title anyway?
It was easy to think Rhodes' anointing as "top face" after coming over from All Elite Wrestling would let it happen. That's in limbo and jeopardized now. It was easy to think Orton, a legend, could do it too, especially given his chance for anniversary feuds and a historic 15th championship down the road soon.
The same can't be said for McIntyre and Rollins. Even worse, it surely can't happen for any other up-and-comer WWE might elect to throw at Reigns. This feels like an obvious time to throw a massive main event push behind someone like Montez Ford or Gunther in order to create more top stars.
We've endlessly seen WWE have these types of chances to finally build new stars in the past. McIntyre's flight to the top, dismantling of Brock Lesnar and carrying the company on his back through the pandemic was maybe the only time it really happened.
That's a proof of concept WWE might want to jump all over again with somebody like Ford. It's as simple as the right push, maybe including a briefcase, followed by a stipulation that he can only take one of the titles off Reigns.
But it all hinges on WWE's willingness to actually take a title off Reigns. The fact he's holding the main event titles on both weekly programs hostage and hardly appearing on either is unsatisfying and similar to what Lesnar did as a part-time champion. Yet WWE might not care, especially if it means he gets to defend both at next year's Mania against The Rock.
There's also that Lesnar or part-timer factor to throw in the mix here. WWE could let young guns rise. It could swerve into a fun Rollins feud. Or...it could back up a Brinks truck in Lesnar's direction and feed fans more of the same, very limited stuff until the other planned feuds return to health and/or we reach the next Mania.
If this all sounds discouraging, it sort of is. This hole WWE hopped in after a little bad injury luck was pre-dug via the lack of building top stars and shoe-horning both titles on to Reigns without a plan. The odds the company can climb back out and exceed expectations aren't looking so hot despite the wealth of talent on the roster and the droves of ideas fans could throw out.
A couple byproducts of this roadblock that probably won't get a ton of attention in the moment but will in the long-term? The impact on this Reigns run and his legacy, never mind the reputation of the top titles in WWE.
What does it say about Reigns' already-fading, career-defining run at the top if he's hardly defending and the company poorly booked replacement stories now that his top two challengers are out? WWE wants this run to establish him as the GOAT, but it's not trending the right away.
And what does it say about the company's top titles if, after two departures, no Superstars really try to fill the void and compete for them? Is the Superstar who takes one of the titles off Reigns, and by extension the brand's main-event scene it belongs to, really going to receive a boost at this point?
These are brutal questions with no easy answers. WWE has pulled some amazing things out of back-against-wall scenarios in the past, but also some head-scratching things, too.
Unfortunately, the injuries make it seem like WWE will use this as an opportunity to remain in a holding pattern, dishing fans more of the same until one of these two big names gets right or Mania arrives, if not both.
Maybe WWE itself won't sink, but the men's main event scene could continue to feel barren while both titles sit on one guy and don't always even make appearances on the weekly programs.